Colombia · Entertainment / Ticketing
600+ transactions reviewed every day. From hours of manual work to minutes.
An RPA-based validation process reviews daily transactions against defined rules and produces automated reports for the team.
Operating model
Client
TuBoleta
Colombia
- RPA
- Transaction Monitoring
- Process Automation
- 600+
- transactions reviewed per day
- 6 h → ~8 min
- review cycle
- Daily
- automated reporting
The operational challenge
What was actually happening in the operation.
01
TuBoleta needed to review hundreds of transactions while maintaining the speed required by a high-volume ticketing operation.
02
Manual review generated significant operational workload and made rapid detection and response more difficult.
Before
How the process operated before AF.
- 01
Transaction volume
- 02
Manual review
- 03
Up to 6 hours
- 04
Delayed response
What AF changed
Not a technology list — a change in how the work runs.
AF implemented an RPA-based transaction validation process that obtains the required transaction information, processes defined validation rules and generates automated reports for review.
Process
- Review became a scheduled automated routine instead of a manual daily task.
Data
- Transaction information is gathered and structured consistently every day.
People
- The team reviews prioritized results rather than reading every transaction.
Automation
- Rules run identically on every execution, with reporting as the output.
- Automated collection of transaction information
- Execution of defined validation rules
- Automated reporting for review
- Daily operation in a transaction-intensive environment
Operating model
How the solution works end to end.
- 01
Transaction stream
- 02
Automated collection
- 03
Validation rules
- 04
Exceptions
- 05
Automated report
Schematic
Measurable impact
Verified figures only.
- 600+
- transactions reviewed per day
- 6 h → ~8 min
- review cycle
- Daily
- automated reporting
In ticketing, transaction review competes with speed. Reviewing hundreds of daily transactions by hand consumed up to six hours and slowed the moment at which something unusual could be seen and acted upon.
With the validation process automated, the same review runs in approximately eight minutes and ends in a report — which changes when the operation gets its information, not only how long the task takes.
What this demonstrates
Capabilities another operation can apply.
Each organisation's context is different, so this describes demonstrated capability — not a result another company will reproduce identically.
- Rule-based validation over high transaction volume
- Compressing a multi-hour control routine into minutes
- Automated reporting as the operational output
- Exception-driven attention instead of full manual review
More evidence
Other success stories.
United States · Healthcare
Next Level Urgent Care
Thousands of HR files. Three systems. Consolidated in 24–48 hours per system.
Read case studyColombia · Government
Municipio de Envigado
A digital process infrastructure supporting millions of government interactions.
Read case studyUruguay · Maritime / Logistics
Gomistar
From maritime service requests to billing control in one digital workflow.
Read case study
Talk to AF
What part of your operation should work better?
Tell us where the work slows down and an AF specialist will review it with you.
Already an AF client?
Support requests are handled through the Client Portal — not this form.
Open Client Portal